Showing posts with label shoes. Show all posts
Showing posts with label shoes. Show all posts

Tuesday, 22 September 2009

Quick hit: Sensible shoes a safety issue?

Greg Cain writes about the health and safety implications of high heels at work in the Herald:
There is a heated debate going on in the UK about, of all things, whether women should have the right to wear comfortable shoes in the workplace.

According to this report by Reuters, the Society of Chiropodists and Podiatrists passed a motion asking employers to work in partnership with trade unions, staff, and local Health and Safety representatives to ensure that proper risk assessments are carried out, and where high heels are deemed a health risk, replaced with comfortable shoes.

... The issue was purely about giving women in certain industries the right to say no to high heels in jobs where they are on their feet for a long time. Feet bear the brunt of daily life, and for many workers, prolonged standing, badly fitted footwear and high heels can be a hazard in the workplace, the Society said. It pointed out that wearing high heels can cause long term foot problems, such as serious foot, knee and back pain, and damaged joints.

The Times reported that Conservative Member of Parliament Nadine Dorries tore into the motion, saying it was intended to cut women like her down to size.

"My job is male-dominated, and the men I work with have killer instincts," the newspaper reported her as saying. "I am 5ft 3in and need to wear high heels," she said...
Click through for the whole thing, and a link to the report mentioned.

Quite interesting how the UK media, and the politician quoted above, have leapt to the conclusion that suggestions that women be given choices about whether or not they have to wear high heels in the workplace is somehow actually restricting their choices...

Wednesday, 8 April 2009

dancing with the pain

i'm not into heels, particularly not stilettos. but i'm definitely not into seeing them on the dance floor. and especially not when the dancing is competitive and you know the female dancers have had to spend hours practicing in the most uncomfortable and inappropriate footwear available on the market.

this was particularly brought home when geraldine brophy was so happy to be sent off dancing with the stars this week. she had been dancing with extremely sore feet, apparently would have her feet in a bucket of ice prior to her performance in order to numb them, and i'm sure the pain wasn't helped by the appalling footwear.

now i don't claim to be an expert on dance. in fact i'd be one of the more ignorant people around. but i've seen very few dances around the world requiring women to wear stiletto heels. from irish dancing to indian classical dance to square dancing to ... well anything i can think of really ... women get to dance with flats, wedgy heels or bare feet. so why this expectation in ballroom dancing, and why do we continue to put up with it when we know it's damaging to women's health?

i'm thinking that there must be scope for an OSH investigation here. the dancers are being paid to perform i would think, so the dance floor is their place of work. and the employers are deliberately requiring women to put their health and safety at risk. it must be a breach of something.

Wednesday, 26 November 2008

One woman's crusade against impractical footwear

I'm not one of your trendy types with glamorous shoes. I almost never wear heels as a matter of principle - they're bad for the body. I like to walk a lot, since it's pretty much the only physical exercise I get; and since I'm late for the train almost every morning, I also need to be able to run from time to time. So I'm forced to wear untrendy shoes - the sort that your nana might wear, only a step up the fashion ladder from orthopedic ones. I can stride to work with great swiftness and purpose, but I look kind of gammy.

I'm not the only woman whose life is somewhat blighted by shoe-related issues. When I'm commuting each morning, I notice that many women wear running shoes, which they presumably change when they arrive at work. A friend of mine recommends this approach strongly. Late for the train one morning, she broke into a run, only to trip over her own trendy shoes and end up face first on the platform. There she lay, hoping that a) no one would notice, or b) she would quietly and inconspicuously die. It was not to be. Another punter grabbed my friend's shoe, which had flown off and landed some two metres distant, and brandished it helpfully at my friend, while berating the train conductor shrilly for no obvious reason. The other commuters looked on in amusement at the dishevelled Cindrella sprawled across the asphalt. In a far less amusing story, another friend of mine sustained an awful compound fracture, running to catch up with the parade to her own graduation. Ouch.

To me, wearing comfortable shoes to work - only to exchange them for impractical shoes - is as annoying as wearing uncomfortable footwear all day long. The idea of hauling a stinky pair of shoes about with me during the day is downright unappealing. What if I wanted to go to the pub after work? I'm hardly going to want to take my Plan B shoes with me. Clearly, I'm a bit of a throwback to second wave feminism, because I can't help but ask, why wear uncomfortable shoes in the first place? Heels still look to me like tools of the patriarchy - false consciousness for the feet - and no amount of third wave reclaiming makes them easier to run in.

I don't expect to gain enough sympathy to start a mass movement around sensible shoes, even from those many other women who have sustained needless and embarassing shoe-related injuries. So it looks like I'm going to be wearing dowdy shoes by myself. I'll look kind of funny, but I'll pace confidently past you on Lambton Quay as you tap along in your aesthetically pleasing heels. Just as well I'm not the Prime Minister's wife, or the media would be mocking my fashion sense even as I type...

Thursday, 18 September 2008

out of fashion

fashion week. yawn. i'm so not into fashion, to the despair of my teenage daughter who thinks she has the most boring mum in the world. actually, she may be right on that one.

it's not that i don't like pretty clothes. when i buy things for myself, i look for nice colours and styles. i like to co-ordinate my headscarves with my outfits, and co-ordinate my scarf pins too. i must admit to being terrible when it comes to shoes, don't bother to co-ordinate those at all.

it doesn't help that i hate shopping. i actually like the spending money part, and i like having new things. it's just the tedious wandering around shops and trying to make a decision part that bores me. which is why i tend to make quick decisions. if i like something, i buy it immediately without looking at what's available elsewhere. after all, time is money and the less time i spend shopping, the more time i can spend on something productive.

there aren't too many clothes i can buy in nz, as the short skirts, tight pants, t-shirts etc aren't things that i'll wear. and because i'm short, alot of the stuff just doesn't work for me - it a top fits nicely at the shoulders and waist, you can be sure the sleeves will be way too long. my favourite place for clothes shopping is malaysia - cheap and pretty, what more can you ask! i also enjoyed clothes shopping in saudi arabia when i was there a couple of years ago.

i've stopped doing jewellery altogether, mostly because i have sensitive skin that will break out into an awful itching rash with the slightest provocation. also because you can't see hardly any of it under the headscarf. and i find rings and bangles just seem to get into the way both at work and at home. of handbags, i have one practical backpack style, and make-up went out the window a few years ago.

so, no wonder i have little interest in fashion week! there are very few clothes that i would even consider wearing. most of the stuff looks so outlandish that i can't imagine other people wearing it either. the models are so far from my body shape that i can't imagine those flowing lines looking good on my frame. i'm sure the same goes for many other women.

my biggest objection to fashion week though is the consumerism behind it. i just get really annoyed by the amount people are expected to shell out for labels. yes, i know a lot of work and effort goes into the design of clothing, the selection of fabrics and colours etc. but i always think of the opportunity cost. this is money that could have been spent on something productive, like irrigation projects in poorer countries, or on medical research to cure serious/terminal diseases.

but even if you're not into those nobler motives, keeping up-to-date on fashion means you have less to invest for retirement, less to build up your capital base and ensure your financial security. this is an area where women are considerably worse off than men, and if we stopped spending money on fashion, make up, beauty products and procedures, we could at least start to change that trend.

i hate the waste of it. fashion constantly changes, so that clothes that could otherwise be worn for several years (it's not like they aren't pretty or practical anymore) are discarded much sooner because they're out-of-date. in a world of limited resources, constantly changing fashions are just not environmentally friendly.

then there is the whole competitive mentality that the fashion industry engenders. it's about being one step ahead of everyone else, about showing off and feeling superior. i'd love to see a world where we had a stronger sense of community, where we identified with each other as friends and allies. it's just a little bit harder to feel friendly towards a person when you're competing to see who has the best, the latest, the most expensive wardrobe. it's harder to identify with her troubles or care about her well-being when you're looking down on her lack of fashion-sense.

as i said at the beginning, it's not that i'm against nice clothes and looking good in what you wear. i guess it's the obsessive attention to ever-changing fashions and designer labels that just doesn't work for me.

Wednesday, 25 June 2008

Feminist gets a wax, anaesthetises crotch with feminism.

Welcome to another infrequent installment of 'Lowering the Tone: Third-Wave Drivel with Ms Enid Tak-Entity'. Warning: contains swearing and references to 'catbags'.

It is a ridiculous state of affairs to have life rudely inform you that one does not learn everything about the state of womanity through reading Cosmo. But I was indeed surprised to recently discover that my current 'phase of life' is coming with some strange 'changes'. No, I'm not fourteen, nor fifty-five. But Cosmo and Cleo never said that the late twenties-early thirties female 'sexual peak' was a result of fluctuating androgen levels which could grant you the joy of getting hairier, zittier, and prone to moronic crushes on unsuitable people. No-one ever mentioned that just as we were getting some kind of control over our lives, that we had a good chance of being hit by a hormone bus and reincarnated as horny, greasy, idiotic teenage boys. I guess it explains Sex and the City. But yeah, thanks a lot Cosmo - or Jezebel or Feministing or Ms. or Jane or even Margaret fucking Atwood - you could have said something ladies. God knows, I was listening. But no, you were too busy being sex-positive third waver propagandists.* Sheesh.

So - I booked my first ever wax at age 30 last weekend. A bikini wax. Call me fussy, but the very slight increase in hairiness, noticeable only to me, was really starting to be irritating. I am not of hairy stock; some phenotypes are just programmed that way. I went through puberty half a lifetime ago, and was well past graduation when I first read an article around the turn of the century, that mentioned asshole-waxing. 'Christ, what girl has hair on their asshole?' I thought to myself at the time.

Eight years later: 'Ah.'

As a naturally unhairy feminist, I've always been able to be offhandedly smug about not shaving or waxing anything, ultimately because there was never any aesthetic demand for it, rather than because of retro-chic radical principle. But this year, fate finally played its bathetic hand, and as Carrie Bradshaw herself might have put it if her character had ever really been writing about sex rather than (sigh) feelings: 'Just as the world was about to get rid of one unwelcome Bush, the universe laid a brand new one on me.'

I just did not like it. It was annoying. It's the northern hemisphere summer right now people, so hot that I'm tempted to wax my head too. Some people think waxing is feminist self-actualisation, while others think that not waxing is feminist self-actualisation. Would waxing both head and my crotch cancel out the feminist or anti-feminist powers of the other end, leaving me neutral? For some reason, this makes me think of how Western porn has women dressed as hookers, but with the hairless crotches of children, while Japanese porn has women dressed as demure schoolgirls, but with completely untended grown-up pubic hair. My depilatory choice however, was rather more influenced by the weather than by porn or feminism. Was it a feminist experience getting hair yanked off my catbag? Did it make me more confident and empowered? Or was it an oppressive moment of false-consciousness and conformity, consigning me to Britneyland? Neither really: it made me minimally poorer, momentarily surprised, and slightly more comfortable in the long run.

But most importantly, drunk.

The advice from the internet and from friends for one's first ever crotch-wax was: get stoned and drunk. The first wax is always the worst, that much is widely acknowledged. I feared that, like chicken-pox, the older you are when you get it, the worse it would be.

Unable to score weed last minute, I swallowed three Nurofen, let them sink in while monitoring the gradual loss of my motor control, then swilled down a triple shot of vodka. Feeling no pain, indeed drifting out of my body, I shambled around the corner to the fancy-pants Clarins Institute. 'This is my first wax ever!' I said in a language other than English. 'Ooh la la', the attendant may well have responded. 'Don't worry though,' I said, 'I'm trashed!'

As the more serious-minded ladies of THM know, women who drink are just asking for punishment. But first, I was clad in what I can only describe as a surgical g-string, and laid out on a comfy leatherette chaise which put me in mind of nothing so much as a psychiatrist's couch. A really nice psychiatrist, with a soothing voice and no hang-ups about cigars. Staring straight up, my eyes were massaged by the soft ceiling accent of a circular blue sky. Wispy clouds drifted in a gentle vortex pattern, seemingly wafted along by calming limpid music that sounded like cucumber water dripping on sleeping eyelids.

rrrrrip 'Yaaaiii! I'm okay. I'm okay. I'm fine. Oh. There's more isn't there.'

The famed misogynist Milan Kundera lyrically examined the etymological and spiritual roots of compassion in The Unbearable Lightness of Being - in a nutshell (somewhere between the S&M role-play and the dog dying) we must experience each other's suffering before we can claim understanding. Why do so many women put themselves through the pain of stilettos, corsets, weave-tracks, or getting their pubic hair ripped out? In my Nurofen-and-Smirnoff reverie, whimpering just a little at each fresh rip, I wondered briefly if I was on an experimental oppression safari. Revisited by this second adolescence, it had seemed like a real lark to embark on my last ever teenage rite of passage. Like losing one's virginity all over again, which was, let's admit, like a holy mission at the time in terms of absolute determination to get it done and dusted, just to know. You knew it was going to hurt, but that was how you knew that you'd be able to take the pain of the rest of your life. It made sense at the time because teenagers are dramatic. Then later, you chill out, realise that sex is actually for enjoyment, and abandon No.1 Shoe Warehouse plastic heels for Kumfs and hoodies. (This, by the way, is the stereotype overseas of New Zealand women. That we are not drama queens, wear hoodies and comfortable shoes, and are kind of slutty. All attributable to early suffrage.)

My waxeuse's name was Virginie. She was very skilled, and it was mostly not that bad. The drugs and booze were definitely the right move. Half the time it wasn't much more of a shocker than ripping off a medical bandage. The right side was surprisingly painful though compared to the left. More neurology on the dominant side - there is no limit to the things you can learn from your vulva. As a finisher Virginie asked if I wanted 'a little off the top?' or 'a little off the sides?' just like an oldschool barber. Hey, I was drunk and high, I just gurgled a little, waved my hand. Yowch. Top and sides were stingy. I looked down and it appeared she'd given me a mohawk. I had the Maddox.

I was most apprehensive about the asshole, but it didn't hurt at all. The asshole, as I should well have expected, can take a lot of punishment.

Afterwards, I was still so boozed that I had difficulty reattaching my strappy gladiatoresque sandals proudly purchased from Kumfs. Wobbling out, and picking up a discount lipstick, "I couldn't help but wonder" if, despite this experience being embedded in a hundred years of feminist theoretical context, I had just successfully waxed my vag completely outside the field of either feminism or anti-feminism.

Well sure, it was still locked into gender theory, but that's neither here nor there, and you'll never be free of that shit anyway.

If you're determined to be superfeminist in every act of your life, I guess there are a few points you could score in this context. High end crotch-waxing will:
1. Give you a really weak example of physically arduous or painful experiences suffered by privileged women, from which you can extrapolate the far more arduous and painful experiences suffered by non-privileged women, and thus motivate your progressive activism through having re-engaged with real-world, everyday experiences outside the ivory tower. Right on.
2. Provide an opportunity to generously tip poorly paid immigrant female service workers, and encourage them to unionise.
3. Give you a great excuse to get shitfaced outside of the judgmental purview of ALAC.


*except for Margaret Atwood, duh.

Thursday, 29 May 2008

I couldn't help but wonder...

Two intelligent, feminist, New Zealand women are waiting at a tram stop in a highly international city. One of them works for NZAID, the other for a UN disaster agency. They have both just seen the Sex and the City movie.

'Um.'
'Am I asleep? I feel like I'm asleep.'
'Hmm.'
'Wouldn't it be great if you had Sarah Jessica Parker's voiceover in your head all the time, telling you exactly what was happening in front of you, so you'd never have to think.'
'That was a long movie. It wasn't as bad as I expected.'
'It was as bad as I expected, but I enjoyed it. I think half my brain has been switched off. It feels good. Numb. It's the top half. The half with the earthquake and the cyclone in it.'
'Do you need a tram ticket?'
'No, I have one of those, um... things. Which mean you don't need a ticket. The name of which. Is French. I can't remember the word. The only words I can bring to mind right now are... like... shoes... handbags...'
'What are you doing on Saturday?'
'Um. Doing. Saturday. Uh... Shoes? Um... handbags? Restaurants?'
'Dior? Chanel?'
'On Saturday, uh... what's the word... Marriage? Apartments? Money? Um... Dresses? Shoes?'
'...'
'...Cake?'
'mmm, cake.'
'I don't even like shoes.'