...As Joanna Russ wrote...“undoubtedly one response to Women can’t write is not to”... There is ample evidence that prior to the 1980s at least, women authors made up only a very small proportion of canonical lists in Western literary higher education. Russ found between 5 percent and 8 percent, although "the personnel change rather strikingly".[1]
In other words, having once made it onto a list of Great Authors Worth Studying, women don't stay there - they are replaced by another tiny handful of different women. Much of what she wrote in that book still holds true today. Read her.
[1] Russ, How to Suppress Women's Writing, p. 79. In Silences, Tillie Olsen came to a well-supported similar conclusion that the usual ratio was one in twelve. Florence Howe recalled how she and a young male teacher redesigned the required sophomore course in English literature at a women’s university: “We chose a series of “major” and “universal” works…in which there appeared not a single woman author nor a single admirable woman as central character”. She also notes that “there was until 1969 no social context in which [her students] and I could find support” for a different approach. Florence Howe, ed., Women and the Power to Change, Carnegie Commission on Higher Education Research Series (New York: McGraw Hill, 1975), pp. 147, 50. This is pretty much the kind of teaching of "English literature" I encoutered at university in NZ in the 1960s.
2 comments:
Thanks Anne. I'd also recommend Amanda's post on Joanna Russ at http://pickledthink.blogspot.com/2011/05/parsing-joanna-russ-1937-2011.html
I've still got two or three of her works in my bookcase, including The Female Man. Her stuff was great, really hard-hitting - must read them again.
Post a Comment