Margaret Thatcher would have been delighted at the way her death is
being treated by the left. What better compliment could there be for
the woman who did as much as she could to dismantle society into a
collection of individual men and women than to treat her death as so
important?
The neo-liberal project was and is all about shifting our thinking
from empathy, from community well-being, from collective action and
compassion for others to self-interest, to individual motivation, to all
too often, greed.
So dismantling the collective provision of free health care,
education, affordable and adequate housing, pensions, provisions for
people who are caring for others – all of those mantras of Thatcher and
co – while they open up opportunities for profit, also teach us not to
care for other people. Smashing unions, undermining collective
employment rights and reducing unemployment protections – while they
keep those seeking and in work desperate to find and keep employment and
vulnerable to exploitation, also create competition and antagonism
between workers. To say nothing of the othering of people on benefits
which is an ongoing necessity to justify continued cuts to the most
vulnerable people in society.
Margaret
Thatcher would have revelled in the importance her individual death has
been granted because it continues that placing of the individual above
society, that privileging of individual agency over the importance of
social structures, that she held so dear, that she championed so
fiercely.
And she would have loved the lack of empathy on display. Loved it.
Is there any clearer indication that the values of those seeking to
destroy the social contract, seeking to promote selfishness and complete
lack of collective responsibility, than the revelling in the death of
an old, sick woman that’s been on display over the last few days?
Let’s tell the truth of Margaret Thatcher and other neo-liberals.
Let’s pay attention to her deliberate smashing of dissent by treating
the British Police force as her own private army, criminalising protest
activities and public gatherings. Let’s notice that in Thatcher’s case
her neo-liberalism was mixed in with social conservatism and nationalism
with devastating results for the rights of all minority groups. Let’s
note the woman who hated beneficiaries was herself a beneficiary of the
feminist movement, even while she trampled all over women’s rights.
By all means, let’s hate the neo-liberal project and the ways it has
unleashed the disgusting, obscene gaps between rich and poor all over
the western world by shifting our thinking from care, solidarity and
collective responsibility to individual selfishness and greed. Let’s
keep organising, keep showing solidarity, keep championing compassion,
equity and justice as guiding values for our society.
But I for one don’t want to celebrate her death, though I understand
many, many others seem to feel that need. She was just an individual,
in a society. And much as I detest her policies, I want to live in a
world where empathy rules, not hatred.
14 comments:
I see your point, but (as you probably expect:) ) I disagree. I have my own post coming up when I'm grounded enough to write it, but I will say that my experience of the past few days has been anything but individualist. Over longer than I've been alive, this event has built up great symbolic and cultural importance. It's been a shared joke and catharsis amongst many, many people who have suffered and fought together. Yes, of course it's symbolic, yes, though she was terribly evil she was of course the product of an evil system which she perpetuated. The issue is what we do with that symbolism. And in the experience of myself and - I believe - many others, it's been coming together, sharing stories of survival, celebrating and looking to fight back against her legacy.
Look forward to reading your post Anthea. I know this post is unlikely to be agreed with by many, many people who I usually do agree with - that's ok - felt driven to write it nonetheless.
For what it's worth, I agree with you LJ.
It's worth plenty Tatjna, thanks for saying.
Not really old enough to understand her impact, I find it strange that people though are comparing her to Saddam, (she didnt have gas/torture chambers did she?)
Maybe Bush is a better comparison.
I certainly wouldn't call her evil.
There's certainly nothing to celebrate about the fact that she died at a ripe old age after a lengthy retirement funded to a high state of luxury by the society she claimed didn't exist. To that extent, we're in agreement.
Didnt she have dementia for the last years of her life?
I might be able to understand the jubilation over a leader who died in office, or died while still having the potential to do "damage". But celebrating the demise of a senile old woman who could barely remember the start of her sentences by the time she finished them is pretty cowardly. You don't win anything just for outliving her, sorry. The battle has long since moved on.
I also find myself bothered that many feminists have completely erased from their memories the fact that she was one of the few Conservatives to vote for the Abortion Act of 1967. Surely some credit is due?
Thank you for this, I agree entirely.
L
Thank you LudditeJourno for redressing some small part of Maia's awful postings on Thatcher's death(and some commenters on here). And kudos to stargazer's thoughtful post also.
Albeit, and heaven knows you're not obliged to read it, but crediting you with intellectual curiosity, I have rebutted one of your points, vis a vis individualism, in a longer post too big to post under comments here. If you would like to read it, you'll find it posted here:
http://lifebehindtheirondrape.blogspot.co.nz/2013/04/paean-to-individualism-maggie-thatchers.html
A lesson in EMPATHY from the luddite?? The glaring hypocrisy smacks one round the ear (with a handful of glitter of course).
No lessons Yvie, just my take on it. Though empathy is a key theme for me always - I think it's the strengths based part of dismantling power over.
As for calling me a hypocrite, you'll have to be a bit clearer - I don't understand what you mean?
Post a Comment