Thursday, 30 April 2009

Ahem...






It's NZ NetGuide Web Awards time. And there's an award for best blog.

Wouldn't it be fun to see a feminist blog in the box seat? Or even just a blog written by women, instead of by the usual suspects.

Please, would you vote for us? You can vote here. All you have to do is put our URL in the "Best Blog" category.

So copy this:

http://thehandmirror.blogspot.com/

and paste it in the Best Blog box on the web awards page.

Thank you.

Quick hit: All this aggravation ain't satisfactioning me

From the BBC's News website:
Women's activist groups in Kenya have slapped their partners with a week-long sex ban in protest over the infighting plaguing the national unity government.

The Women's Development Organisation coalition said they would also pay prostitutes to join their strike.

The campaigners are asking the wives of the Kenyan president and the prime minister to join in the embargo.

They say they want to avoid a repeat of the violence which convulsed the country after the late-2007 elections.

...Patricia Nyaundi, executive director of the Federation of Women Lawyers (Fida), one of the organisations in the campaign, said they hoped the seven-day sex ban would force the squabbling rivals to make up.

...But the BBC's Anne Waithera in Nairobi says the campaign is likely to meet stiff [boom boom - J] resistance from some men.

Our correspondent says some would argue that Kenyan men cannot even abstain for two days.
Click through for the whole thing.

This could be interesting to follow!

And a big flourish of my muskateers hat, complete with large feather, to Hugh for this one.

Attention Wellington readers

There may be an event of interest to you occuring on

Thursday 21st May


in the evening somewhere centrally located.

More details as they come to hand...

APOLOGIES THE DATE HAS NOW CHANGED TO WEDNESDAY 20th MAY!

Gob. Smacked.

(No this is not a post about the child discipline referendum, although there will be some to come on that very topic soon!)

The wonderful George emailed me via Facebook with an astonishing link to some of the pictures from a 1970s children's book called "I'm Glad I'm a Boy! I'm Glad I'm a Girl!".

Here's my second least favourite, I'll leave you to guess which I despised the most.

More racism for your entertainment

Recently, THMers debated Eskimo lollies. Some saw them as a racial slur; others thought they were a harmless bit of kiwi heritage.

Now, Apple have release an iPhone game that's drawing criticism: Pocket God. The game features identifiably Pasifika 'primitives', which the player controls.

What, if anything, is the difference between this and Eskimo lollies? Does it matter more if you offend people who live closer to your home. Does the medium - lollies vs a game - make a difference? Does it matter that the game is new, rather than part of NZ's so-called heritage.

I guess this game is supposed to be an ironic bit of technological glibness - it's advocates will argue that no one takes such things seriously. I think it's just some more crude racism. How did racism get trendy again?

What say you?

Thursdays in Black: Behind the Scenes film contest


Organised by the Auckland Coalition for the Safety of Women and Children:
Make a short film for YouTube about relationship violence against women and be in to win $2000 for first prize, $1000 for the runner up. Help prevent violence against women! Go to behindthescenes.co.nz for more information.

Domestic violence is a serious and lethal social problem in New Zealand. One in three New Zealand women experience physical and or sexual abuse from a current or former partner in their lifetime (Fanslow, 2005). To encourage young adults to engage with issues relating to domestic violence, we are running a YouTube competition in 2009, open to young men and women aged 17-24 inclusive (not just film and media students). The task is to make a short video clip that explores male relationship violence against young women.

Although this project is about boyfriend violence towards girlfriends, many men have respectful and loving relationships.

Women have come a long way but some men still use violence towards women in relationships. Domestic violence has been dragged out of the closet. This is an opportunity to drag boyfriend violence out in the open! We want all young people to have a go at challenging this culture by promoting respectful relationships.

You could have a go at busting some myths.

Some myths that need busting:

  • Boyfriend violence doesn’t happen except to hoodrats
    “I thought domestic violence only applied to old people.” Lilly
  • Boyfriend violence is only physical violence
    “He used little put-downs that snowballed until I felt I was nothing.” Kyllie
    “He kept phoning me all the time. He wanted to know who I was with and where I was.” Katene
  • She stays so she must like it.
    “I felt like crap. I thought nobody else would want me.” Jodie
  • She deserved it.
    “He said she cheated on him.” Callum
You can see some sample videos at the Behind the Scenes website, and find out heaps more besides.

Many thanks to reader Caroline for emailing me about this, sorry it's taken me a while to get this up!

Wednesday, 29 April 2009

feminism + mirror = awesomeness


On flickr:
(Here is) Where I Come From: (Here is) What I am Getting At

When I was a student at Texas State I wrote a paper on the subject of feminism in contemporary art for Pat Taylor. I chose the subject and there were an abundance of resources with queries about the place of feminism within the practices of such artists as Cecily Jones and Sara Lucas, so on and so on. I spent many hours trying to find a young, successful female artist working today that would answer even the simple question, "do you consider yourself a feminist?" in the affirmative. That particular resource was never found. It exists. Somewhere. It has got to.

Feminists raised me. Some of these women would never identify themselves as such. My grandmother for instance, but luckily there were others, my aunt Noemí López, my principal Mary Ashley, my mentor Sue Robertson who all identified themselves as feminists. My aunt Noemí has been or still holds office or sits on the board of The Texas Women's Political Caucus and Planned Parenthood. She took me to every feminist rally, conference, meeting, debate, fundraiser that she was attending to fulfill her responsibilities as my God Mother. She also took me to mass on Sunday.

On April 25, 2004 hundreds of thousands (some reports say over a million) people participated in the March for Women's Lives in Washington, DC. It was the largest protest in our nation's history, though many do not know it happened. One of the participants was Ashley Judd. She wore a T-shirt that read, "This is what a feminist looks like." This glam gal movie star is not what the public identifies as a feminist. She is beautiful, wears sexy gowns on the red carpet with non-sensible shoes. There are a lot of girls that want to be just like her. Another day I saw a guy exiting the grocery store with his cart with the same shirt on (I mean, it said the same thing. I don't think it was the same shirt). He was attractive, well groomed, wore a wedding ring and wasn't driving a hybrid. I didn't see his wife around. Maybe she was at home or maybe she was at work, working at an equitable job, or maybe she is deployed to Iraq, or possibly drafting legislation, or is a Union Pipe Fitter for a local in Chicago, or maybe she is meeting with her editor or she is finishing the work for her exhibition that opens in Berlin next month.

This work that I have produced is meant to instigate an everyday agency. Personal agency begins with identity. My part in an everyday revolution toward change begins with how I see myself.

One step in becoming an artist is calling your self one.

Jen López

Chicago, IL
February 2007
Floral swimming cap gratefully tipped to Feministing's Fun with Feminist Flickr

MCP Watch: Karl du Fresne on women's accents

Dominion Post curmudgeon Karl du Fresne dedicated a third of his column yesterday to the horror that is the bad bad sound of lady broadcasters talking:
It won't surprise anyone to hear that my periodic grizzling about the ghastly voices of female broadcasters has had zero effect. If anything, things have got worse.

On my local radio station I hear a young woman announcer who sounds as if she has just inhaled helium. Even Radio New Zealand, the last citadel of correct pronunciation, has fallen to the Barbarians. There are female reporters on the state-owned radio network who would make Lyn of Tawa sound like the Queen.
But wait, there's more!
I recently heard a female RNZ journalist report that a district howth board had wowcomed a crackdown on teenage drinkers. And did you know the Labour Party is led by someone named Full Goff?

Female broadcasters were once regarded as exemplars of proper speech, but in a bizarre upending of the norm, they now talk in a wince-inducing kay-way accent far worse than anything heard on the streets.
Really? What about male broadcasters?

You'll be pleased to know though that du Fresne does not restrict his criticism to Kiwi sheilas:
It's almost a relief to report that the phenomenon is not unique to New Zealand. Australian political journalist Kerry-Anne Walsh, who does a weekly report from Canberra on Radio New Zealand's Morning Report, has a voice that would make a flock of galahs sound melodious.
Can't say I'd noticed. i love listening to Kerry-Anne Walsh as I find what she has to say interesting, and often communicated in a witty and intelligent manner. Silly me!
I have heard it argued that none of this matters as long as we can understand what people are saying,
Finally some sense!
to which my response is twofold. First, it's physically painful to listen to some of these awful voices torturing the language; and second, it's getting to the point where we can't understand them.
Oh dear, I typed too soon. I wonder what type of torture reading a Karl du Fresne column constitutes?
It's only a matter of time before we'll need subtitles on the TV news bulletins to explain what some female journalists and newsreaders are saying.
But not the men. Maybe we should just replace the ladies with fellas and solve the problem?

Big thanks to reader Tessa for emailing me about this stunning piece of ridiculousness.

Super City

Auckland this, Auckland that - those from outside the Queen City may want to skip this because it's going to be all about the Cultural Commercial Political Banking Capital of our dear nation.

I've lived in the Auckland region my whole life; North Shore City for my youth, Manukau City for a brief time earlier this decade, and Auckland City for the rest. I'm not a local government geek, but I do take a bit of an interest and (no surprises here) I'm keen for Aucklanders to be as involved as possible in their local democratic institutions.

A Super City seems somewhat inevitable at this point. I would dearly love to see a referendum on the matter, not least because I think to get buy-in to such a major overhaul of the way democracy works in the region you need to give people a vote as part of the consultation process. Starting out by enforcing a new local government model in an undemocratic model is almost setting the new structure up to fail. So often opposition to change is more about the process than the proposal itself, because the process is too fast, appears to be predetermined, and doesn't actually consult properly. People don't get to considering the proposal seriously because they are too pissed off by the poor way it has been communicated, and an understandable scepticism about the consultation.

Concerns about how the democratic representation will work for tangata whenua have predictably involved some claiming Maori want special treatment. Well yes I suppose they do. As the people of the land, the people who were here first and have historically been treated pretty crappily, they are special. They're asking for a handful of dedicated seats to recognise that specialness and to ensure Maori voices are at the council table, particularly given how crap Aucklanders are at electing Maori representatives to local government. Is giving Maori a say really so threatening that it's to be thrown out despite the Royal Commission's recommendation? Ngati Whatua Orakei are organising a hikoi around this issue. It's being supported by the Community Coalition for the Auckland Region, which has been set up "to ensure that the outcome of the restructuring promotes democracy and community well-being."

After all our current councils don't have a particularly good record on diverse representation. White faces dominate, as do those on higher incomes. Because this is a feminist blog I'm going to muse in a bit more detail specifically about the proportion of women elected to our councils, although I do think there are broader issues about representation than just the gender mix. Here goes:
  • The Auckland Regional Council has 13 councillors - six are currently women (46%)
  • The Auckland City council has 20 councillors in total, including the Mayor who is directly elected. Only six of the 20 are women - three elected on the centre-left ticket City Vision, two from centre-right Citizens and Ratepayers (which holds a majority on the council with 11 seats), and one independent who is a Green activist.(30%)
  • Manukau has five women on it's council of 18 including the Mayor. Much more ethnic and age diversity than the other councils, as you would expect in a community that's browner and younger than the rest of New Zealand. (28%)
  • Waitakere has 14 councillors plus the mayor. Six of the fifteen are women. (40%)
  • North Shore has 16 on it's council, including the mayor, and eight are ladies. (50%)
  • Rodney has 13 councillors, including the region's only female mayor (former Act MP Penny Webster). Including Webster, there's a total of four women. (31%)
  • Franklin has a council of 13 in all, with three women on board. (23%)
  • Papakura has 8 councillors and a mayor. Three of these nine are women. (33%)
With the exceptions of North Shore and the ARC things aren't looking that flash. One mayor out of seven. Someone with more knowledge about local body politics than I may be able to share whether this is the highest level of female representation ever?

I'll be heading along tonight to hear Len Brown, current Mayor of Manukau, at the Auckland Drinking Liberally. The democratic structures of New Zealand's biggest city are important enough for us to use our precious baby-sitting credits in the hope that tonight we'll be meeting with others also interested in using this opportunity to make Auckland more democratic and representative, not less.

Reminder: Campus Feminist collective launch tomorrow night in Akl

Part of Womensfest at the University of Auckland is the launch of the shiny new Campus Feminist Collective:
Wine and Cheese Tasting Launch Party
Thursday, April 30th
5pm-7pm
Executive Chambers (will be signposted from Munchie Mart)
(The details have changed a little from last time I posted about this, please note this is the correct stuff).

Here's more on Facebook.

Mmmmmm cheese, wine and feminism, what more could you ask for?

More new laydeez in Blogland

Ampersand by Chiara (via PrettyPrettyPretty's tweets)
Dear Mrs Skin (thanks G for finding this gem!)
not so secret squirrels by Camille
Wellywood Woman (found via Elsewoman)

And Barnsley Bill now has a woman on board - Princess Fiona

The Literary Tradition of Women

Women's writing is not determined by biology, anatomy, or psychology. It comes from women's relation to the literary marketplace, from pressures to live public and private lives, from literary influence.

What is women's literature and is there a place for a women's literary history? The academic Elaine Showalter talks about her new book A Jury of Her Peers: American Women Writers From Anne Bradstreet to Annie Proulx (Knopf), and discusses some of these issues. Showalter argues that even today, after all these freaking years, women's writing remains largely unknown and that this is to do with the fact that women's writing hasn't been pulled together into a defined literary tradition.

The good news can be found in the progress that Showalter describes.

And the end of the story? In an earlier work, I talked about the phases of British women's literature: "feminine" (bowing to male expectations), "feminist" (rebelling), and "female" (articulating women's experience). By the 1980s and 90s, I think, we'd entered a new stage: "free." Women had joined the juries, as publishers, critics, reviewers, authors. No longer restricted to certain subjects, they could, for example, write about violence and boxing, as Joyce Carol Oates does. They could, like Raymond Carver, be minimalists (look at the understated style of Amy Hempel or Ann Beattie). They could write from any perspective, even a male one. They were multiculturalists.

That doesn't mean that their work has become fully integrated into our literary culture: That's why I wrote the book.

More here.

Tuesday, 28 April 2009

Kiwibank cracks a funny

Wandering through the train station, I saw a billboard advertising Kiwibank's new debit card. It read:

"Mine won't let me spend what I haven't got... (unlike my girlfriend)"

It's not entirely clear, but I take this to mean that women are prone to be a bit frivolous and self-indulgent with money - or at worst, gold-diggers. And I was kind of surprised. That's not a stereotype you see much these days, outside of sitcoms.

I tried to reverse the genders in my head, to see if the joke still worked. Nope. There's no equivalent comic stereotype around men being daft with money. I assume this is because women have traditionally been non-earners, caring for homes and children. Because that sort of work isn't paid, it's regarded as a kind of dependence or - at worst - a form of economic exploitation of blokes, who have to work for a living while their wives muck about at home.

Everyone knows a woman or two who's poor at managing her money, and relies on her partner. Everyone knows a man or two who does the same. I'd say that financial scatterbrains are distributed pretty equally between the sexes. For every closet full of unworn clothing and impractical shoes, there's a huge screen TV and a garage full of under-used power tools.

I wasn't particularly offended by the billboard - I just thought it was a bit dumb. If Kiwibank wants to attract a female clientele, making us out to be financially useless isn't the best tactic.

Quick hit: Maternal health shortages lead to unnecessary abortion

The most popular link on Stuff today:
A pregnant Wellington woman had her baby wrongly aborted because an ultrasound was misread by a radiologist in Australia.

A follow-up ultrasound at Hutt Hospital nine days later showed the baby was simply in an unusual position and was still alive.

But by then the woman had been given medication to terminate the pregnancy and the baby later died.

An external report into the case also criticised the woman's independent obstetrician for terminating the pregnancy after just one ultrasound, when the scans are known to be inaccurate in such cases.

The report, issued to The Dominion Post under the Official Information Act, found the mother, who had difficulties conceiving and had already had two miscarriages, desperately wanted the baby and should have been told the diagnosis might be wrong and given more time to decide.

At the time of the incident, Hutt Hospital had a "low number" of radiologists and was forced to send urgent after-hours scans to specialists in Australia.
Click through for the rest of the article. WARNING: May be hard reading for those who have miscarried or had ectopic pregnancies.

Choosing whether or not to terminate should not be made harder by systematic failures in our health system. I really feel for this woman.

New Horizons for Women Trust - award application deadline approaching!

The New Horizons for Women Trust is dedicated to promoting educational opportunities for women and encouraging research focused on women and girls.

They have a range of study awards available, including the Second Chance Education Awards. Applications for these close on 31st May and eligibility is as follows:
Applicants must be women aged 27 years or over, who have not obtained a qualification of NZQA Level 4 (or the equivalent), and who are studying in NZ for an NZQA-approved qualification.
If this sounds like you then check out their website for more information.

Monday, 27 April 2009

religion and gender equality

a while ago, i was asked by "random lurker" on my own blog what i thought of this BBC discussion about whether or not religion is the biggest obstacle to gender equality. i've been meaning to get back to it, but i suspect i've been subconsciously avoiding it because it's such a difficult topic. i'm not sure that i can give any particular insights, but here are some thoughts.

the discussion happened particularly in the context of a 17 year-old girl beaten by the taliban in northern pakistan, apparently for the crime of having a relationship they didn't approve of. the BBC, in trying to make it a wider discussion (or to be PC according to some of the commentors), threw in a couple of other examples from judaism and catholicism. then they could frame the discussion in terms of "religions" rather than "islam", thereby avoiding any complaints of being racist (against pakistanis) or islamophobic.

nonetheless, despite the fact that i don't like the framing, it's a valid question to consider. the history of most religions show various degrees of violence against women, such as stonings, witch-burning, sati, and the like. then there was the non-violent discrimination which saw women kept out of religious leadership/priesthood, or which saw mensturation and labour pain as a form of divine punishment, or which believed that women must be reincarnated as men before they could reach their final resting place. i'm sure you'll all be able to come up with many examples.

my first thought on reading the question was that you would have to look at societies or communities without religion, and compare these with religious communities. if the former showed gender equality, then one could say that religion was the major barrier. unfortunately, i don't know of any societies that are completely without faith, or which have not been influenced by faith in the way they were set up and now continue to operate.

the only example, one used by many in faith communities, would be that of communism where religion, in all its outer manifestations at least, was outlawed. if the premise was true, then women in communist countries would have gender equality, because of the lack of religious barriers. again, i have to confess my ignorance here: i don't know anywhere near enough about those countries to be able to take any kind of position. all i know is that i've never heard of a woman communist leader running a country and the majority of the leadership in those countries appeared to be male, so total equality was probably not achieved.

the point i'm trying to get to is that barriers to gender equality exist with or without religion. they exist when women don't have, for example, as much of a media voice as men. when they don't have equal participation in leadership as men. when they don't have access to the same financial resources as men. when they don't have access to justice when they are wronged. when they are unable to reach their fullest potential simply because they are thought incapable.

those inequalities exist in all societies in the present day, to a lesser or greater degree. i don't doubt that religion has been a barrier, but i also don't doubt that when a leadership group (such as the taliban) is bent on oppressing a population, they will use what ever pretexts they can come up with to justify their behaviour. religion is convenient, but if it didn't exist, something else would be used instead (survival of the species, culture/tradition, protection of the innocents, whatever).

the problem with religion is that it becomes very difficult to argue against a faith belief. when a person tells you that [insert name of divine revelation here] prescribes a particular way of doing things, and said revelation comes from God, there is very little by way of logic that you can offer as a counter. when women are excluded from learning and from theological debate, it's very hard to provide another perspective.

however, revelation is open to interpretation. i've watched people justify what (to me) are fantastical positions, and pull out various phrases and/or proofs out of context or exclude other proofs that clearly contradict their particular position. inferences can be drawn; words can be taken literally giving one meaning or they can be taken allegorically giving another meaning altogether. a ruling given in a particular instance for a particular context can be generalised unfairly, if it suits the party making the generalisation. and all of this is done with an air of self-righteousness, any opposing argument portrayed as being the work of the devil himself, which very quickly stifles debate.

yup, i've seen it happen often. but i am still a person of faith. and my faith means so very much to me. not only is it integral to my identity, but it is also a source of support and comfort. it gives me inner strength, and inspiration to be better than i otherwise might have been. if you were to take my faith away from me, it would be like taking my inner core, leaving me floundering and helpless, and without hope.

so. to achieve gender equality, my view is that women need to work within their faiths to push for change. movement does happen. look at the progressive jewish community compared to the orthodox. look at the anglicans, who now allow women into leadership positions. i know a female buddhist priest. there are many other examples, but it takes persistance and hard work. just like it does when we work outside a faith context. for example, changes to domestic violence legislation, women's suffrage and the like, have taken hard work and commitment from many, many women.

it's not easy pushing for change within faith communities. but it has never been easy to push for change. anyone daring to challenge the status quo is labelled a radical, is shunned and has often to suffer violence before any gain is made. but someone has to do it, or nothing will ever improve.

There will be cake


It's almost time for the 12th Down Under Feminists Carnival. That means a year of gathering together feminist blogging goodness from Australia and Aotearoa New Zealand. Fantastic. The carnival will be held at Chally's place, Zero at the Bone, and she has promised CAKE.

Time to get your submissions in. Any feminist post (broadly interpreted) from any down under blogger (broadly interpreted) is eligible. Submissions close on 2 May, and you can make them via the carnival submission page, or if you can't get the page to work for you, e-mail Chally directly at chally dot zeroatthebone at gmail dot com. so go on - submit some of your own work, or some posts you've particularly admired. It's a way of letting other feminist bloggers know that their work is appreciated.

While you're at it, think about hosting the carnival yourself sometime. Carnival co-ordinator Lauredhel is looking for a host for August and for subsequent carnivals. You can contact her at lauredhelhoyden at gmail dot com.

Monday Funday: with flickr-y feminist fun

US feminist uber-blog Feministing has a great series called Fun with Feminist Flickr, and this recent shot tickled my funny bone:

From here originally.

I made a joke about the internet being a series of tubes at a work team meeting a few months back. Only one person got it. I waz sad.

Autumn newsletter from the Auckland Women's Centre

The Auckland Women's Centre has put together a great newsletter for autumn, featuring articles on the following:
  • Pay equity - they are now hosting the petition on their website too (scroll down, it's fourth from the bottom)
  • Kristin Dunne-Powell - I especially liked this quote: "Anybody who encourages a man to not take full responsibility, prevents them from moving on with their life."
  • Domestic violence: knowing is not enough
  • And much more good stuff
Thanks so much to Leonie for emailing me about this, putting our blog in the newsletter and for keeping me in the loop in general. I've added a number of events to our calendar based on the services and activities going on at the centre in the coming months.

If you are involved with a women's centre and would like The Hand Mirror to promote your centre and its events please email me julie dot fairey at gmail dot come and as time allows I shall do what I can :-)

And big ups to all those women out there who contribute to women's centres; your work helps so many people!

Quick hit: Fast and er dirty

In Stuff's sports section:
Sebastian Vettel and the Red Bull car he calls 'Kate's Dirty Sister' have given Formula One championship leader Jenson Button plenty to think about ahead of Sunday's Bahrain Grand Prix.

The eye-catching moniker came to light after Vettel powered through rain, spray and treacherous standing water to hand his team a breakthrough first victory at the Shanghai circuit last weekend.

"Like a ship, a car should be named after a girl as it's sexy," the 21-year-old German explained to reporters when asked about the name stuck on the dashboard of his car.

"My original car was called Kate. But then it got smashed at the opening race in Australia. So we called this one Kate's Dirty Sister because it is more aggressive and faster."
Click through for the rest, which is actually about motor racing.

Most of the article is about sport. But the beginning, and the headline (Faster, more aggressive: Meet 'Kate's dirty sister') are about the car's name. Head, meet desk.

Shiny red racing car helmet curtly tipped to Cynical C, via Facebook.

What women [business travellers] want

Gulliver (The Economist travel blog) has a piece about how women are becoming a significant group of business travellers and how hotels are attempted to respond to this, spurred on no doubt by a general decline in business traveller numbers.
The way hotels are trying to reach out to female business travellers is an interesting study in gender stereotypes. Hotels, apparently, have finally answered the age-old question of what women want. Their answer, according to the Dispatch story, is evening wine hour, in-room spa services, curling irons, "fashion tape", aromatherapy, and, of course, yoga.
However, the writer goes on to argue that all business travellers have the same basic needs:
There's an element of silliness to this story. Women have been travelling for business for years, and both sexes need the basic things a hotel provides. Everyone wants a safe, comfortable place to sleep, wash up, and maybe get some work done.
As someone who travels a bit for work, this story got me thinking about whether I would choose to stay in a hotel that specially catered for women, or had a women-only floor. I think I tend to agree that if a hotel could get the basics right (clean, reliable internet connection, a good shower), I can forgo the aromatherapy. However, are there useful services that hotels could offer women?

Sunday, 26 April 2009

The Odds & Ends Drawer

It's been a while, but here's some goodies, in no particular order:
As always, feel free to share links in comments :-)

Also I've updated the Blogroll a little, and added heaps of listings into the events calendar in the sidebar. New additions still and always welcome. Thanks for your help with this.

Unicef's Unite for Mothers campaign

Unicef is running a campaign highlighting the issue of HIV pass-on during pregnancy, labour or delivery, due to the lack of diagnosis and treatment for many pregnant women around the world. Around 1,400 children under 15 are newly infected with HIV every day, mostly due to mother-to-child transmission, which is actually very easily prevented. It's an issue about adequate healthcare and access to medication for women; there's a drug that halves the risk of a baby getting HIV for its mother and it costs as little as $1.70, yet many cannot get it.

The campaign is called Unite for Mothers, and here's a bit more from their website:
Mother’s Day (10th May) celebrates the strength and trials of motherhood. For millions of women in the developing world the risk of HIV and AIDS is a reality, and pregnancy poses new concerns. Far too few pregnant women are tested for the virus and far too few are treated. With no diagnosis, and no treatment, the mother’s baby is at risk of contracting the disease too. Testing the mother and getting treatment to both mother and child is essential for their survival.

This Mother’s Day, we want you to join UNICEF in reminding New Zealanders and our Government that every mother who is tested and treated for HIV and AIDS may one day see her child grow up healthy. The best gift a mother could have.
Action options include:
You can find out more about preventing mother-to-child HIV transmission here[PDF] and there's a radio interview about the campaign here [at 2:48 on the counter].

Great chance for a bit of craftivism! Big thanks to readers Nikki and Marianne for emailing me about this, and sorry it has taken me awhile to write about it.

Womensfest at UOA starts tomorrow!

Sounds awesome and I understand there may also be a zine circulating on campus to mark Womensfest too?

The launch of the Campus Feminist Collective is on Thursday, here's the info from the Facebook page:
Launch of group!

Wine and Cheese Tasting Launch Party
Thursday, April 30th
6pm
Womenspace (for now, but will change if men cannot enter)
All welcome regardless of gender identity!

Topics:
- Why is feminism important?
- How you can get involved on campus!
- Includes a speaker from the Women's Centre on feminism in Auckland and why it is important
Many years ago I was involved with the Raving Feminist Witches, which later became Feminist Action. I still have very fond memories of the stuff we did and the positive experience of pursuing women's issues together sowed the seeds for this blog. It's fantastic to see a feminist collective starting up again at the University of Auckland.

An apology

Further to discussion recently about appropriate apologies etc, some might be interested in this example of a public apology. Tsuyoshi Kusanagi is a member of the long-running Japanese boy-band SMAP and was arrested on suspicion of public indecency after being found drunk and naked in a public park in the early hours of Thursday morning.

Some cultures do apologies and remorse better than others. It is probably worth pointing out that this was as near to a "victimless crime" as it is possible to get, really, the incident in question being a solo naked romp in a deserted park at 3am in the morning.

"As an adult, my actions were embarrassing. I deeply regret what I did," 34-year-old Kusanagi, a member of popular male pop group SMAP, told a packed press meeting in Tokyo's Minato Ward on Friday night. Kusanagi, who was arrested on suspicion of public indecency after being found drunk and naked in a park in the ward in the predawn hours of Thursday, was released on Friday afternoon. He will be forced to cancel his entertainment activities for the time being.

"I caused a lot of concern and trouble to my fans, concerned parties, and my fellow members of SMAP. I'm really sorry," the somber Kusanagi said as he bowed before the 300-strong media corps gathered at a major recording company's conference room shortly after 9 p.m. "I drank too much, to the extent that I was out of control. I regret my actions very much," said Kusanagi, clad in a blackish suit and tie. "I deeply apologize."

"I had never become naked in public before. I once stripped myself down to my underwear while drinking at home," Kusanagi continued. "I sometimes drink to the extent I lose myself." He even revealed that his fellow SMAP members once warned him over his drinking habit: "Maybe they were worried about me going like this today. I wasn't conscious enough of my actions."

When asked why he drank to the point of becoming unconscious, Kusanagi said, "Although I'm aware that I have the support of many people, it was my weakness that I drank (too much)." Kusanagi, however, flatly denied that he was suffering from any stress or pressure. "I want to return to SMAP as soon as possible. But I need to reflect on my actions. It's something that cannot be decided by my feelings alone," he said. At the end of the 30-minute-long press conference, Kusanagi bowed again and said, "I'm terribly sorry."

There has also been reaction from the government due to Kusanagi's role as official promoter of Japan's move to digital TV broadcasting, as a result of which households will need to invest in new tellys.

Internal Affairs and Communications Minister Kunio Hatoyama vented anger when asked to comment. ''The act is shameful for a person who is asking the public to shoulder a financial burden'' of buying new televisions to prepare for the shift. The minister said he plans to remove all the posters promoting digital broadcasting that feature Kusanagi, while the singer's arrest immediately triggered the cancellation of commercials featuring him airing in Japan, including one by Toyota Motor Corp.


What do you think? An appropriate response? Too harsh? How do you think this incident would have played out in New Zealand?

Saturday, 25 April 2009

ANZAC Day roundup

As part of our brief to promote the blogging of NZ women, here's a round-up of posts on the main theme of April 25th each year, the commemoration of wars gone by:

ANZAC Day irritations by Deborah - on the forgetting of other letters by the As and the NZs
Lest we forget by Anna - rejecting nationalist and romantic reinventions of war
Shipping off by the ex-expat - soldiers are still being shipped off to war today
ANZAC Day by Cactus Kate - considers what today is like for politicians
Anzac Day across the Commons by Brenda Wallace - links to a resource looking at the uploads today
ANZAC Day disconnection by Lucyna Maria - remembers her family's military connections
ANZAC Day by dzeni - sharing her ANZAC image
For all the uncles and cousins we never got to meet by bustedblonde - sharing a poem and her thoughts
Anzac cookies by tammy - yum!

Homepaddock has written quite a few posts about today, and there may be more to come?
Her story
Sidi Reszegh
His story
They also served

Boots Belts Rifle and Pack

Feel free to add others that fit the brief in comments. If I get a chance I'll add anymore that I find to the list tomorrow.

I was going to write a post myself reflecting on what I heard at the ANZAC service I took Wriggly, but I think I'll wait until tomorrow. Mostly because of Anna's fantastic post, but also a little bit because I slept while Wriggly did and now I haz no time!

Oh and here's a link to last year's roundup for ANZAC day too.

Further additions, Sunday 26th April:
Anzac Day - Finding out who you are by Barbara Else - on a relevant documentary you may have missed
Heather Roy's Diary this week featured her reflections on the meaning of the day.
A rare treat by bustedblonde - regarding an aviational commemoration of Anzac Day.
anzac day by sas - a poignant pic and quote
Lest we forget the conchies by The Paradoxical Cat - focuses on conscientious objectors
Anzac Day by Dawn Rotarangi - remembering

And here's a couple of manly contributions well worth perusing: Joe Hendren's The 25th of April is still a day for selective rememberance and Dolan's War stories (which may be of particular interest to Giovanni).

Lest we forget

Some thirty years ago, my dad got chatting to a very old man. In the course of the conversation, the old man remarked that he'd been his mother's favourite son. He then added, 'But the other four were killed in the war'. Four bleak telegrams, each telling a mother that the child she'd raised and loved was gone.

I'm one of those who sporadically attend the Dawn Parade. I do it because I want my children to understand what happens when the world goes crazy, casting aside morality and sense in favour of mindless nationalism and militarism. That's the one and only lesson I'm able to draw from World War One.

I was horrified one year, when the Dawn Parade speaker took the opportunity to talk about how New Zealand must be ever-vigilant, poised to enter international military conflict. I had the same feeling again a couple of years ago, when a group of women were derided for commemorating the sexual and other violence against women during wartime. The feeling returned last year, when Australian veterans refused to allow the children and grandchildren of deceased veterans to march with them, wearing the medals of their fathers and grandfathers. (Following an outcry, the Aussie vets backed down, allowing the descendants to join the parade.)

These three examples have a common theme. Each understands war as a story of heroism, with room in the cast for only one group of actors: the men who served. And I understand why they feel this way. By acknowledging the cruelty and injustice which is an inevitable part of any war, for civilians and military alike, they feel that the enterprise in which they suffered and lost friends is lessened or even mocked. So, too, is their service.

I don't believe that admitting the horrific nature of war, and its impact on civilians, diminishes the individual men who've gone to war. I may not believe in the principles for which these men served, but I acknowledge that it takes courage to go to the other side of the world and face harsh and brutal conditions, knowing that it might be a long time before you see the people you love once more. To take the stance that war is undesirable is not an attack on those who served.

I have a fear that some people are attracted to ANZAC day celebrations by a combination of romanticism and nationalism. Discussions of Gallipoli often end up with the trite observation that WWI camaraderie between kiwis and Aussies exists to this very day, in the form of good-natured rugby rivalry. Forgotten amongst the glib media-packaged nostalgia is the cynicism of war: the facts that dispensable Antipodean men were sent into the Gallipoli campaign in the service of an indifferent empire; and that Turkish casualties, military and civilian, far outweighed those of the ANZACs.

War is not a simple tale of noble men serving high principles. It's a far more complex story of wealth and territory; kids who grow up without dads; women who raise families alone, unsure whether their partners will return; conscientious objectors; torture; deprivation and cruelty against civilians; a number of men who return home, physically and psychologically broken, to families that don't know them; and some men who don't make it home at all.

The theme of ANZAC day is 'Lest we forget'. If we treat war as some romantic, nationalistic boys' own adventure, then we've already forgotten.

Shipping off

This ANZAC day many New Zealanders and Australians have their minds fixated on the needless deaths of past needless deaths. This weekend I'll be thinking about one of my dear friends based in the States. After finally settling down with the guy of her dreams, she found out she was infertile. She just took it all her stride and went through the long and very expensive process of adopting two delightful boys from the Ukraine. 2 years on the boys are happy, healthy and have acclimatised to their new home. The progress of the elder one who arrived in America illiterate but now has the reading age of a 9 year old is amazing and a testament to her dedication as a mom.

But what's all this got to do with ANZAC day you might ask?

Well her husband is in the army and will ship off to Iraq in the coming months. Yes she knew the deal that marrying a solider meant there was a likelihood that he might go somewhere dangerous and might come back missing pieces of his body if he is unlucky or not at all if he is very unlucky. But that isn't going to make the next year or so any easier on this little family.

I'm sure I could write plenty analyzing why it is wrong that he is being sent in the first place just as I could about the thousands of sons, fathers, uncles and nephews who were sent to far-off places.

But right now all I can hope for is that he returns safe and well sometime next year.

Friday, 24 April 2009

Friday Feminist - Christine de Pizan

Cross posted

After hearing these things, I replied to the lady [Reason] who spoke infallibly: "My lady, truly has God revealed great wonders in the strength of these women whom you describe. But please enlighten me again, whether it has ever pleased this God, who has bestowed so many favors on women, to honor the feminine sex with the privilege of thevirtue of high understanding and great learning, and whether women ever have a clever enough mind for this. I wish very much to know this because men maintain that the mind of women can learn only a little." She answered, "My daughter, since I told you before, you know quite well that the opposite of their opinion is true, and to show you this even more clearly, I will give you proof through examples. I tell you again-and don't fear a contradiction-if it were customary to send daughters to school like sons, and if they were then taught the natural sciences, they would learn as thoroughly and understand the subtleties of all the arts and sciences as well as sons. And by chance there happen to be such women, for, as I touched on before, just as women have more delicate bodies than men, weaker and less able to perform many tasks, so do they have minds that are freer and sharper whenever they apply themselves."


"My lady, what are you saying? With all due respect, could you dwell longer on this point, please. Certainly men would never admit this answer is true, unless it is explained more plainly, for they believe that one normally sees that men know more than women do."

She answered, "Do you know why women know less?"

"Not unless you tell me, my lady."

"Without the slightest doubt, it is because they are not involved in many different things, but stay at home, where it is enough for them to run the household, and there is nothing which so instructs a reasonable creature as the exercise and experience of many different things."

"My lady, since they have minds skilled in conceptualizing and learning, just like men, why don't women learn more?"

She replied, "Because, my daughter, the public does not require them to get involved in the affairs which men are commissioned to execute, just as I told you before. It is enough for women to perform the usual duties to which they are ordained. As for judging from experience, since one sees that women usually know less than men, that therefore their capacity for understanding is less, look at men who farm the flatlands or who live in the mountains. You will find that in many countries they seem completely savage because they are so simple-minded. All the same, there is no doubt that Nature provided them with the qualities of body and mind found in the wisest and most learned men. All of this stems from a failure to learn, though, just as I told you, among men and women, some possess better minds than others. Let me tell you about women who have possessed great learning and profound understanding and treat the question of the similarity of women's minds to men's."


Christine de Pizan, The Book of the City of Ladies, 1405

I only want to say...


That is all.

In which everyone misses the point

The front page of the herald had a story about a Miss Universe contestant in Australia who was deemed too skinny to be crowned.

Sure enough everyone weighted in about the contestants size but yet nobody asks the question about why these events are still being held rather than just imposing arbitrary limits about what is safe in the first place.

Quick hit: Will the other wife get to be Second Lady?

From the Herald online this morning:
... As Jacob Zuma, the man preordained to be the country's next President, voted in his rural Zulu homeland yesterday, one of his two current wives stood to the side watching patiently as he was mobbed by cheering crowds and reporters.

But Nompumelelo Ntuli, 34, Zuma's newest and youngest wife, was soon attracting her own crowd of admirers.

...

Zuma, 67, a Zulu traditionalist and polygamist, has married at least four women over the years. Only two are still with him: Sizakele Khumalo, whom he married in 1973, and Ntuli, whom he wed last year.
Click through for the whole article.

I don't really like the whole First Lady phenomenon. Maybe if couples ran together, and were elected together, but they aren't.

And Zuma isn't exactly known for being pro-woman, having been acquitted of rape after using the unfortunately typical nasty defence.

voluntary military service

you may have heard about the proposal for a military gap year for school leavers being discussed in the media recently. apparently one of the benefits of such service would be the salary earned by students, which could be put towards their study expenses. to which the tertiary education union has the best response:

“It’s outrageous that the government has seemingly given up on the widely accepted goal that tertiary education should be accessible to all on the basis of ability rather than wallet size”, said Ms Riggs, in response. “If the government really wants more people to study, then why not pay for it directly rather than telling people they should first spend a year or so in the military?”

i have deeper concerns about our young people going into the military. first of all, it doesn't appear to be an enviroment that is particularly woman-friendly, although it has no doubt been improving in recent years. no doubt some of the skills gained would be useful, but it would be much more useful to take up volunteering in the community (link is to a discussion on radio nz). it's a better way to build up community spirit and a sense of belonging, while helping those in need.

i'm just not a fan of military service, although i know that some people have to do it. i'd much rather we got our population to do peace studies than military service. how about we train everyone in the arts of mediation, negotiation and conflict resolution instead.

The complainant

Anna has discussed the rape myth's used in the recent trial of a taxi driver rapist. This was the second trial, as a previous conviction was overturned on appeal. One of the reasons that the appeal was successful:
The prosecutor was also criticised for "personalising" the issues and repeatedly using the victim's first name instead of calling her "the complainant".

Could there be a clearer indication that rape trials are not allowed to be about rape survivors. It is a mistrial if a rape survivor has a name.

I'm sure this could be changed, if enough effort was put in then eventually this decision could be over-turned. Eventually rape survivors would be allowed names.

If that was achieved, then it would be a step - a name is a step towards being allowed a control, being allowed a story, being allowed to exist. But I think

I don't expect this one issue to persuade anyone to abandon reform of the trial system. But I hope it will make it helps people understand the size of the problem, and maybe consider the possibility that there may be better ways of getting justice.

Thursday, 23 April 2009

A fitting honour

Even though I was very unhappy with the third term of the Labour government in New Zealand, Helen Clark is one of my heroes.

I am delighted that her alma mater, the place where she studied and taught, has decided to award her an honorary doctorate.

Honorary doctorate for Helen Clark

Congratulations, Helen Clark.

New laydeez in teh Bloglandz

(Not necessarily new new, but new to me, and soon to be new to our blogroll too.)

A Blog Named Fred
Meg Bates
The Topp Twins
Pigalina's Palace

Check them out!

Guest post: Mustwatchable Girls

Thanks so much to reader (and dear friend) Rebecca for this great review of Untouchable Girls.

I was surprised to find myself so moved by Leanne Pooley’s documentary about the lives and careers of the Topp Twins. Maybe its an age thing – as a schoolgirl in the eighties I was a bit too young to be fully aware of their role of troubadours of the protest movement. The Topp Twins I knew were in their late nineties TV carnation – Camp Leader and Mother, Ken and Ken etc. Lots of fun, obviously, but it’s a very small part of the picture of their lives and careers.

What Untouchable Girls showed me was how closely connected Jools and Lynda Topp were to every social movement I have romanticised from the first half of the eighties (being too young to have experienced them). Nostalgia, clearly, is not as good as it used to be – and the documentary pandered to my still-recovering-from-the-election yearning for a bit of old school mass social movements that actually achieved their goals!

So the Topps’ story runs parallel to the story of New Zealand growing up politically. From their positively idyllic Waikato farming childhood, the Topp Twins found their yodelling musical voice as the left in New Zealand found a voice on issues that continue to define us.

The film uses a nice structure to tell the story of these iconic women’s lives - a concert featuring guest appearances and an all-star audience is interspersed with archival footage, interviews with Jools and Lynda in and out of character, as well as with other important people from their lives.

The Topp Twins reminisce about their very hands on participation at Bastion Point (clearly, what the left needs is more farmers daughters prepared to get their hands dirty and less sociology students) and sing Nga Iwi E with Mereana Pitman, who stood shoulder to shoulder with them on the field stopping the infamous Springbok test in Hamilton. They lend their tuxedo clad support to Fran Wilde’s Homosexual Law Reform bill, and also help provide the soundtrack to the anti-nuclear movement (despite their own early days in the army – meeting interesting people and learning how to kill them!).

Of course, its not just the Topp Twins’ political activism that features in this very warm and funny film – it also tells their personal stories. We meet their partners and see their home lives – and Lynda’s role as a ladies woman comes through as she jokes about her affect on married woman. And, at the emotional heart of the film, we get a searingly personal look at Jools’s recent battle with breast cancer. The twins bravely take us right into the chemotherapy room, and a the sisters talk about the comfort they take in the simple country life they cherish and have seemingly never been tempted to abandon.

Ultimately, the film taught me an important lesson about how these wonderful women were able to combine their leadership in some of our most controversial divisive political movements with a wonderful knack of being able to relate to and connect with people who surely were among their staunchest political opponents – ordinary rural folk.

Quick hit: Rural Female Bachelor challengers

Spotted on Scoop:
The search is on for the 2009 Fieldays Rural Bachelor of the year. Entries are now open to single men from all over the countryside. Eligible bachelors who think they’ve got what it takes, should be aged over 18, work in the rural sector and exude understated kiwi charm.

Entries close 18 May, 2009. Following preliminary judging, just eight finalists will go on to compete for a incredible suite of prizes valued at over $15,000, the coveted Golden Gumboot trophy, and the title of Fieldays Rural Bachelor of the Year.

Fieldays Rural Bachelor of the Year takes place at NZ National Agricultural Fieldays, held 10-13 June 2009, at Mystery Creek. During the events four days; eight bachelor finalists will test both their rurally derived skills and country charisma in a number of competitive heats.

This year’s heats mark the exciting introduction of female bachelor challengers.
For the first time ever, eight single women from the rural sector will be invited to challenge the blokes; in a duel of gender wit and farming skill during the Friday bachelor heats on 12 June. Following Friday’s battle of the sexes, all 16 contestants will be treated to dinner at Ohaupo’s Windy Ridge Café and Bar.
[my emphasis]
Click through for the rest.

I'm not quite clear on the role of the female candidates; it seems they exist to challenge the men? Maybe Homepaddock (who just turned one, hurrah!) has some ideas? The website mentions something about a Ladies Afternoon...

Thursdays in Black: Herald recognise family violence worker

The Herald's been running an "Unsung Heroes" series and today they have an article about Michelle Bratty:
A single candle given to her each Christmas is one of the ways Michelle Bratty knows that the work she does is helping.

The North Shore mother of two has been the first point of call for many victims of family violence for 10 years.

She has dealt with numerous cases, from women abused by their partners to whole families wanting a new start.

Having seen a few "rough" cases, she says she is constantly reminded of the good that comes from her efforts.

"I've got one particular family who give me a candle every Christmas. She was a girl who was only 18 years old.

"When I went to see her, she had her arms folded - bruises up and down them from her boyfriend. She didn't want to talk to me," Ms Bratty said.

"It took a while but she came through and now she's applying for the police."

Ms Bratty works as the family violence assistant with the Orewa police.
Click through for the rest.

She sounds like a very worthy recipient indeed, one of many working behind the scenes offering practical assistance. And to give some props to the Herald, for once, it's good to see them acknowledging this work.

The Eskimo debate

This week's news has reported how Seeka Lee Veevee Parsons, an Inuit visiting New Zealand, took offence at Eskimo lollies, a favourite of kiwi kids for as long as I can remember. As Parsons explained, the word 'Eskimo' is racially offensive, and disappeared out of the Canadian lexicon some decades ago. According to my dictionary, it means 'eater of raw meat' - hardly a compliment. Parsons' complaint seems to have unleashed a torrent of crap behaviour from some of local rednecks, who've called on her to just pack up and go home if she doesn't like the way we do our racism.

Parsons' concerns have also met with very little sympathy from the lollies' makers. Cadbury, who produce Eskimos and other Pascal's lollies, said, "We have no intention to rename, reshape or remove the product, and trust that consumers will continue to enjoy Pascall Eskimos".

Would Cadbury use a racial slur that offended a large group of New Zealanders? Probably not. The difference seems to be that racism matters less when it's directed at far-away, exotic-seeming people.

I call that bullshit, Cadbury.

Wednesday, 22 April 2009

Because being abducted by a pervert is every woman's dream...

A Wellington taxi driver has been convicted of exposing himself to a woman in his cab, abducting her and indecently assaulting her.

That this should have happened is bad enough. Even worse is the defence raised by the taxi driver's lawyer:

After a long cross-examination, the taxi driver's lawyer, Letizea Ord, put it to the complainant [that she] said "no" in a joking, flirting or teasing way.

"What I am suggesting to you is the way you used the word `no' is you weren't using it seriously," the defence lawyer said.


You've got to have an utterly bizarre world view to think, even for a moment, that any woman would consent to a night-time taxi ride with a stranger who got his wanger out by way of introduction. There are some seriously derogatory views of women underlying this kind of suggestion - yet the suggestion that women enjoy the attentions of predatory men continues to be raised in court. Prejudices like these are no less offensive and unjustifiable than pulling out racial stereotypes to sway a jury (although it wouldn't surprise me if this is done too from time to time, if more subtly).

FFS, as the young people say.

Quick hit: Three strikes sentencing may be bad

From the Herald online (I didn't notice it in the paper copy?):
The "three-strikes" policy is likely to increase the level of unreported family violence, a survey of ex-offenders and their families has found.

Government officials have also warned "life sentence without parole" could push criminals to kill police and victims to avoid arrest.

The Act Party's three-strikes policy has been introduced as part of the Government's support agreement although Justice Minister Simon Power has conceded it may not make it into law.

An informal survey by lobby group Rethinking Crime and Punishment showed the proposal was likely to increase the level of unreported family violence.

"Rethinking has discussed the three-strikes bill with a group of offenders, ex-offenders and their families and whanau," director Kim Workman said.

"One response, consistent with the three-strikes experience in the USA, is that offenders facing a second or third strike offence, would have little qualms about committing further violent acts to escape apprehension or conviction."
Click through for the rest.

So what exactly is this three strikes thing going to improve?

Feminist Event: Sue Bradford at Drinking Liberally Wellington

My apologies for not getting this up earlier - I am a bit behind with blog stuff at the moment (read: very very behind), and sadly this is not the only thing waiting in the queue for some attention! Thanks for your patience everyone.

What: Sue Bradford, Green MP, at Drinking Liberally's Wellington chapter
When: Thursday 23rd April
Where: The Southern Cross, Abel Smith St, Wellington

Here's more from the Facebook event page:
Sue has been an activist on social justice, peace and womens’ issues from 1967 until the present day. She was Vice-president of the New Labour Party in 1989-90 until joining the Green Party in 1990; Stood for the Green Party in the 1998 Auckland City mayoralty elections; was the Green candidate for Rodney in 1999 & 2002, and for Northland in 2005. First elected to Parliament in 1999, now 3rd term MP and 3rd on the 2008 Green Party List. Sue is the Green Party’s candidate for East Coast Bays for the 2008 Election.

Sue represents the Green Party in Parliament to help bring about genuine, positive solutions to the unemployment, poverty and environmental problems which plague so many people and their communities in Aotearoa today.

We'll start at 5:30pm, Thursday April 23th, and Sue will speak from 6pm - stick around afterwards for a drink and a chat.
Sounds awesome, wish I could be there!

Welcome katy!

After two excellent guest posts, katy has graciously agreed to join the team here at The Hand Mirror.


Yay! Look out for her first non-guest post sometime soon :-)

Hi-5 goes low-brow

Kellie Crawford, formerly of the kids' entertainment group Hi-5, has had a change of career, appearing in lingerie on the cover of Ralph men's magazine.

Critics have accused Crawford of setting girls a bad example - fair enough. But I also think Hi-5 sets girls a bad example. In fact, I think it's bloody awful (although my son and daughter would strongly disagree).

The sexualisation of the three women of Hi-5 is disturbing: they primp and giggle coquettishly, their appearances are immaculately managed, and their movements are always constrained and ladylike in contrast to the males, even when they're dancing. I've known of grown men who've watched Hi-5 from time to time - and it wasn't for the storytelling or catchy tunes.

Neither sexualisation or gender roles are necessary to interest kids. Playschool, the much-loved TV programme of my youth, featured luminaries like Jackie and Barry and Rawiri. No sex appeal there. The women and men alike were dressed appropriately for the physicality of entertaining kids, and there was little difference in the way they acted or spoke. Playschool engrossed a generation of kids - and no one ever came away from it with body image issues. What changed?

The fact that a children's entertainer has made such a seamless transition to sex symbol should give us pause for thought about the calibre of kids' entertainment. Kellie Crawford may only recently have got her kit off for the camera - but a number of Hi-5 'fans' have been mentally undressing her for years.

Tuesday, 21 April 2009

Twyford not seeking Mt Albert

Saw this on The Standard but can't read their blog from work, so can't link to their post, sorry. Here's more from Stuff:
Labour list MP Phil Twyford has ruled himself out as a candidate in Mt Albert.

The move effectively closes the door on a return by former Auckland Central MP Judith Tizard.

Ms Tizard is the next on Labour's list and would have come back to Parliament if Mr Twyford had stood and won the seat vacated by former prime minister Helen Clark.

Mr Twyford said he believed the by-election was an ideal opportunity to bring more fresh talent to Parliament.

National will choose between current List MP Melissa Lee, who entered Parliament last year, and Ravi Musuku, who has been the local candidate for at least the last two elections iirc.

Candidates who might seek the Labour nomination, particularly given Twyford is not, could be:

  • Hamish McCracken - strong support from union affiliates, has served his time running in unwinnable seats, and is ambitious to be an MP soonest
  • Helen White - employment lawyer, local member who has been in and out of the party
  • Meg Bates - former Young Labour president, politics Head tutor and lecturer*, and I believe a sometime reader of this fair blog
  • Louisa Wall - former Labour List MP, a bit further down the current list than Tizard, considered a possible successor to Clark in Mt Albert in the past, but perhaps not very well liked?
  • Glenda Fryer - Auckland City Councillor with large personal following in the area

I'm sure there are others I've left off that others might wish to mention in comments. And the Greens have made it clear they are going to run a candidate; given the forthcoming leadership contest between Turei and Bradford perhaps this selection may become more important for their internal party politics than it might have otherwise. Mt Albert is one of the Greens' best seats for party votes, but whether they can convert that into a good running in the by-election will depend on who the person is. One of the major local issues (the Waterview Tunnel) is very much in their territory.

It's a sign of hope to me, as a feminist, that in the first by-election of this new Government, after a decade of female prime ministers, that there are so many women in the mix for this race. If it ends up being Hamish versus Ravi it'll feel kind of odd!



* Apologies to Meg, I got her job description a bit wrong, but I've fixed it now. You can find out more about Meg here, thanks to her for emailing :-)

Fat hatred

Cross posted

Global warming is all the fatties' fault! Of course!! And even better, in addition to paying for indulgences, we've now got a scapegoat as well.

Some researchers at the London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine have compared fat people to gas guzzlers, and opined that being fat is bad for the environment. According to their nifty calculations, fat people produce one tonne more of carbon dioxide each year than slim people.

FFS! Let's put that in perspective. Taking the UK as vaguely representative of developed nations, and because the researchers are based in the UK, then each citizen of the UK on average is responsible for 10 tonnes of emissions per year. So even if the researchers' numbers are correct, then being fat only adds about 10% more emissions than being slim. The problem is not being fatter, but existing and consuming resources at an excessive rate at all. And as it turns out, all citizens of developed countries do that.

This "research" is mere fat hatred, in fancy guise.

H/T: Stuff

Disclosure: As it turns out, I'm quite slim. This is nothing to do with me personally, and everything to do with scapegoating a certain part of the population.

Quick hit: Lose weight or kill the planet

From Reuters, via Stuff:
Overweight people eat more than thin people and are more likely to travel by car, making excess body weight doubly bad for the environment, according to a study from the London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine.

"When it comes to food consumption, moving about in a heavy body is like driving around in a gas guzzler," and food production is a major source of greenhouse gases, researchers Phil Edwards and Ian Roberts wrote in their study, published in the International Journal of Epidemiology.

"We need to be doing a lot more to reverse the global trend toward fatness, and recognize it as a key factor in the battle to reduce (carbon) emissions and slow climate change," the British scientists said.

They estimated that each fat person is responsible for about one tonne of carbon dioxide emissions a year more on average than each thin person, adding up to an extra one billion tonnes of CO2 a year in a population of one billion overweight people.

The European Union estimates each EU citizen accounts for 11 tonnes of greenhouse gas emissions a year.
There are many many reasons why some people eat more than others. And our measures of what constitutes "overweight" are not always very robust. I wish this article was a bit longer and had a bit more analysis about what the problem is and some possible solutions.

Kids are rad

When I hear arguments in favour of the 'right' to smack kids, I feel glum. But when I feel glum, there's nothing I like to do more than think about my kids and how much I love them.

I think about how, when I get home from work, my son (who's almost three) shrieks 'Mama!' and attaches himself to my leg. It's a gesture of affection, and sometimes a surreptitious nose-wiping manoevre. And I think about my daughter (seven and a half), and how she insists she'll never leave home because she loves me so much - she's going to get married and have kids, and the whole lot are going to live at my house, she says. (I'm sure her future husband will be thrilled with this arrangement.) They may give me grey hairs, but I wouldn't be without my little people, not even for a minute.

I think kids are for hugging and loving and celebrating. So if, like me, you need a bit of cheering up, I invite you to share stories about kids - your own (biological or not), or others. Because kids are funny and kids are rad!

Monday, 20 April 2009

Quick hit: Caesarean numbers up

From the Herald yesterday:

The number of elective caesareans in New Zealand has risen from 7 per cent of total births a decade ago to more than 10 per cent in 2006, the latest Ministry of Health figures reveal.

Of the 14,362 caesareans performed that year, 60 per cent were urgent procedures, where the decision to operate was made during labour. The rest were elective, where the mother made the decision during pregnancy.

But that choice was still likely to be based on clinical reasons, said AUT University's head of midwifery Jackie Gunn. She said medical advances meant more women with conditions that carried a greater risk of complications were able to give birth.

And a policy shift which followed research showing caesareans were safer for breech babies - those born feet or buttocks first - also accounts for some of the increase.

Click through for the whole article, which includes brief interviews with two women, one who gave birth vaginally and the other by caesarean.

I was just relieved to see an article that for once didn't assume elective caesareans were too posh to pushers. Although I'm a little confused that they talk about the record number of C-sections without putting it in the context of a record number of births in general...


The great and almighty Sarlacc

No not a Star Wars reference but Sarah Haskins taking on the infamous beaver commercials among others.


Protest, with cupcakes and puppy


Something I went to for work on Friday, so I'm not going to blog about it in detail, you can find out more here.

Random Impertinent Referendum Questions

As inspired by this comment on this post, and with apologies to Cactus for stealing her title.

There's a referendum coming in August, which Anjum has recently written about. There's a campaign to vote Yes, despite a really rather stupid question, one that is loaded to encourage as many No votes as possible:
Should a smack as part of good parental correction be a criminal offence in New Zealand?
If this is voted down then I expect to see future referenda questions along the following lines in due course:
  • Should a smack, as part of good spousal correction, be a criminal offence in New Zealand?
  • Should a smack, as part of a positive relationship between friends, be a criminal offence in New Zealand?
  • Should a smack, as part of an industry-leading customer relations standard, be a criminal offence in New Zealand?
  • Should a smack, as part of a best practice child behaviour policy in education, be a criminal offence in New Zealand?
  • Should kicking someone in the back, in the midst of the breakup of a romantic relationship betwen the kicker and the kickee, be a criminal offence in New Zealand?
From Dave Moskovitz:
The question being asked is really stupid; if it were rephrased as "Should it be illegal for a manager, as part of good management practice, to hit an employee" we wouldn't be here arguing about it.
Two suggestions from Paul:
"Should it be illegal for an interrogator, as part of good interrogation practice, to hit an interrogatee?"
[and]
"Should it be illegal for a child, as part of growing up, to hit a parent?"
Here's one from Brian Edwards:
This is the equivalent of asking: ‘Should doctors recommend an exclusive diet of McDonalds and KFC as part of a healthy weight loss programme?’ McDonalds and KFC cannot be part of a healthy weight loss programme. And it is open to serious doubt whether smacking can be part of ‘good parental correction’.
Feel free to add yours in comments, or blog about them yourself.

In the face of the inane referendum question that we really have to vote on in August I believe voting Yes sends a message that you reject the presumption that violence of any sort, smacking or otherwise, is a good way to correct children.